An Ebola vaccine produced using a chimpanzee common cold virus appears to be safe to use on humans, according to a study published today in the New England Journal of Medicine. Three
different doses of vaccine were tested on healthy humans in the UK, and
it was well-tolerated; it triggered high levels of antibody formation
without also triggering serious side effects. But until the vaccine is
tested in an area where an Ebola risk actually exists, it’s efficacy
against the disease will remain a mystery.
The current outbreak has claimed the lives of over 22,000 people
Since the beginning of the West African outbreak, Ebola has claimed
the lives of over 22,000 people. There’s no cure for Ebola, but it can
be controlled through routine hand-washing and by using gloves and other
barriers to prevent contact with infectious bodily fluids. It doesn’t
spread through the air; only direct contact with the body fluids of a
person who is showing symptoms of Ebola will spread the disease. Still,
the death toll from Ebola has been devastating, and researchers are
actively searching for a way to protect people from becoming infected.
In the study, researchers tested three different doses of the vaccine
for safety and tolerability. They did so by giving a single dose to 60
healthy participants in Oxford, UK. Then, the researchers monitored the
patients for four weeks. During that time, they measured the
participants’ immunological responses to the vaccines and checked for
negative reactions. The vaccine didn’t raise any safety concerns, and
only two people developed fever in its aftermath.
"They showed that there’s a good immune response."
"They showed that there’s a good immune response," says Kirsten Lyke,
an Ebola vaccine researcher at The University of Maryland who didn’t
participate in the study. It triggered the production of a high level of
antibodies, she says, and "it seems pretty safe."
The vaccine used in this study was made by isolating a chimpanzee
cold virus that doesn’t cause illness in humans. Researchers deleted
genetic material from the virus to prevent it from reproducing in humans
after vaccination. Then, they introduced a gene from the Ebola virus
into the cold virus. This change causes the virus to use a patient’s
cells to synthesize an Ebola protein belonging to the Zaire strain, the
strain currently raging in West Africa, upon vaccination. When that
happens, the protein is recognized by the human immune system as
something to combat, and the body responds by producing T cells and
antibodies that researchers hope will be enough to fight the Ebola virus
should exposure ever occur.
This isn’t the only Ebola vaccine undergoing testing. There are several other vaccines being
tested for safety at the moment, including a similar one that expresses
two forms of Ebola proteins — one from the Zaire strain and one from
the Sudan strain. "This means that potentially protective vaccines could
be available to health care workers in the field within clinical trials
to assess vaccine efficacy" in the near future, says Katie Ewer, an
immunologist at The University of Oxford and a co-author of the study.
"Efficacy can only be tested in the context of exposure to the outbreak in West Africa."
Now that this trial is over, Ewer and her team hope to try to improve
the immune responses they’ve seen by introducing a second vaccine made
from a modified vaccinia Ankara virus — a virus that was used to make
the smallpox vaccine — and using it as a booster dose. The results of
that study should be published in the coming months, Ewer says. Of
course, the most important step is to test the vaccine in an area where
people are actually at risk for Ebola. "Efficacy can only be tested in
the context of exposure to the outbreak in West Africa," she says.
Until that happens, all researchers can do is test vaccines for
safety and compare the immunological responses seen in humans to those
of vaccinated chimps exposed to Ebola. "The next step is to ask 'does it
actually protect against Ebola?'" Lyke says. But "at least humans are
mounting good immune responses" in the meantime.
No comments:
Post a Comment