Mitt Romney closed the door Friday on another White House run,
clearing the field of a formidable name and triggering a dash to woo his
donors.
The 67-year-old former Massachusetts governor and 2012
Republican presidential nominee announced his decision on a Friday
morning conference call with supporters, donors and advisers from past
campaigns. “I’ve decided it is best to give other leaders in the party
the opportunity to become our next nominee,” he said on the call.
Mr.
Romney’s decision ends a turbulent, early chapter of the 2016
presidential campaign, one that kept even his closest advisers guessing.
After previously saying he wouldn’t run again for the White House, Mr.
Romney scrambled the GOP nominating contest just three weeks ago by
telling a group of donors he was considering another bid.
By standing down, Mr. Romney removes a major impediment to former Florida Gov.
Jeb Bush,
New Jersey Gov.
Chris Christie
and other likely GOP candidates who are courting the centrist,
big-dollar donors who had backed Mr. Romney in 2012 and whose financial
support can help a candidate build momentum.
“Today’s news certainly does reopen the fight for donors,”
said
Matt Moore,
chairman of the South Carolina GOP. “Many donors had been frozen
in recent weeks, taking a wait-and-see approach. There’s a finite amount
of money that can be raised, so every candidate benefits.”
On
the call Friday with supporters, Mr. Romney gave few clues about what
drove him to abandon a third White House bid after sending every signal
he would run. He repeatedly told those on the call he was “convinced” he
would win the nomination if he sought it.
“Mitt struggled with
the decision,” said Eric Fehrnstrom, a longtime Romney adviser who was
involved in the planning behind what would have been a third
presidential campaign. “He felt it was time to let the mantle of
leadership pass to others in the Republican Party.”
In announcing
his intent not to run, Mr. Romney also sought to quash speculation that
he might reconsider his plans as the race played out, saying it was
“unlikely’’ that any new circumstance would prompt him to change his
mind.
“Accordingly, I’m not organizing a PAC or taking donations. I’m not hiring a campaign team,” he said on the call.
The
announcement Friday came as a surprise to many Romney supporters who
had spoken with him in recent weeks. He sounded every bit the candidate
on Wednesday during a speech at Mississippi State University, leveling
criticism at former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the front-runner
for the Democratic nomination.
On the call Friday, Mr. Romney
seemed to take a veiled swipe at Mr. Bush, saying, “One of our next
generation of Republican leaders, one who may not be as well known as I
am today…one who is just getting started, may well emerge as being
better able to defeat the Democrat nominee.”
Mr. Bush released a statement shortly after the announcement hailing Mr. Romney as “a patriot” who has worked hard for the GOP.
Mr. Romney’s short-lived flirtation with the 2016 race had stirred mixed emotions among fellow Republicans.
His
unexpected interest in the race prompted some in his party to argue the
GOP needs a fresh face in 2016. Democrats, meanwhile, delighted in the
prospect of a rematch with the man they beat in 2012.
“I think he
made the right call,” said
Pat Mullins,
who recently stepped down as chairman of the Virginia Republican
Party. “He is popular, and I think it would be a discredit to him to not
get the nomination.”
At the same time, Mr. Romney led most polls
of the emerging GOP field. In a Fox News survey released Friday, he was
the top pick of 21% of self-identified Republicans. That gave him a
substantial edge over Kentucky Sen.
Rand Paul
and former Arkansas Gov.
Mike Huckabee
,
both at 11%, and Mr. Bush, at 10%.
The announcement caps a
frenzied three weeks for Mr. Romney and his close-knit team of
advisers, many of whom were caught off guard when he first expressed
interest in the race during a meeting with donors three weeks ago in New
York. Republicans had been prodding Mr. Romney to run for months, but
it wasn’t until that session that even his closest advisers knew he was
truly interested.
Mr. Romney and his advisers spent the
intervening period calling donors, aides and other supporters of his
past campaigns to gauge their support for another bid.
Last
Sunday night, a small team of trusted former aides organized a call with
Mr. Romney to tell him that, if he really wanted to run, he should
establish a political committee of some kind in the next week or so to
let donors and grass-roots supporters know he was serious, according to a
person familiar with the call.
Mr. Romney was noncommittal on
that call but added events to his itinerary during his Wednesday visit
to Mississippi to give it the feel of a presidential campaign trip,
including lunch with the school’s football coach, Dan Mullen.
Then Thursday night, a day after his speech, he called his
closest advisers to tell them he wasn’t going to run. He said he and his
wife, Ann, made the decision last weekend but wanted to sit with it for
a week before making his intentions public.
The announcement
sparked an immediate push by other Republicans to lock up Romney donors
who were waiting for him to make a decision before committing to other
candidates. Allies of several likely contenders said their favored
candidate stood to benefit from Mr. Romney’s departure.
“The
biggest beneficiary of Mitt’s decision is Gov. Bush and his fundraising
effort,” said
Al Cardenas,
a Bush supporter and former chairman of the Florida Republican
Party. “If you ask me who is getting the most calls today from the donor
community, it will be Jeb, by far.”
Ray Washburne, who recently
left his post as finance chairman of the Republican National Committee
to help Mr. Christie, said he received a flood of phone calls from
donors interested in backing the New Jersey governor.
“I’ve been
on the phones since 7 o’clock this morning with donors who want to be on
the Chris team early,” Mr. Washburne said. “There are a lot of people
who hit the pause button. Now, they are making decisions.”
Messrs.
Romney and Christie were scheduled to dine together Friday night in New
York City, said a person familiar with the matter, stirring speculation
that Mr. Romney could back the New Jersey governor.
Mr.
Christie campaigned for Mr. Romney in 2012, and the two are thought to
be friends. An endorsement from Mr. Romney could push his donors in Mr.
Christie’s direction.
In trying to rebuild his campaign network
in recent weeks, Mr. Romney was finding a competitive environment.
Jonathan Burkan, a Romney donor from 2012, made it clear to the Romney
team he would be supporting Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, saying Mr.
Romney faced a much steeper climb to the nomination in 2016 than in his
prior race.
“He realized that the field is much, much stronger,”
Mr. Burkan said. “There was absolutely no path to winning against such
strong support.”
Despite aggressive efforts by Mr. Romney’s
finance team to secure commitments of financial support, many of his top
donors didn’t rush to back him again this time.
“I have not heard a groundswell of support for Romney in the city when I thought he was running,” said
Kathryn Wylde
,
chief executive of the Partnership for New York City, a group
whose board consists of top business leaders. “There’s been
substantially more support for Bush and Christie than for Romney this
time around.”
A third White House bid could have given Mr. Romney
and his team the chance to correct past mistakes, primarily the
perception that he was an out-of-touch patrician who didn’t care about
people lower on the income rungs. In a pair of speeches earlier this
month, Mr. Romney signaled that he would champion policies aimed at
spurring upward mobility and helping lead people out of long-term
poverty. He also prodded the party to improve its outreach to minority
communities, who largely shunned Mr. Romney in 2012.
Mr. Romney
was criticized by many during his 2012 bid for creating the impression
that he cared more about wealthier Americans than those struggling in a
tepid economy, an image he helped cement that image with his comment
that it wasn’t his “job” to worry about the “47%” of Americans who
receive government benefits.
The decision left some of his most
ardent supporters chagrined. “Bummer,” Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz wrote on
Twitter. “Mitt would have been one of the best presidents ever.”
No comments:
Post a Comment